Pitfalls of retirement planning

170815.Retirement Pitfalls

Retirement expert reconsiders previous thinking

Most planning advice, both regarding saving for, and the enjoyment of, retirement, is given by people who are not retired. So, while the advice may be well meaning, it could inadvertently suffer from a lack of empathy with the realities of retirement.

In addition, the experience and expectations of current and previous retirees may differ significantly from that of the vast numbers of baby boomers that will increasingly dominate the ranks of the retirees over the next decade. As a result, retirement advice based on researching earlier generations may not be as relevant as desired.

A recent article in “The New York Times”, titled “Three Things I Should Have Said About Retirement Planning”, touches on the above issues. It is a confession by Paul B. Brown, who co-authored two books on saving for retirement in his 30s and 40s and is now aged over 60, that his typical advice suffered some inadequacies, now made apparent by his own life experience.

Click Here To Read More

Does “rentvesting” make financial sense?

170718.Renvesting

Rentvesting: a cheaper way to own a home?

Before attempting to answer the question posed by the title of the article, it may be necessary to explain what “rentvesting” is. Essentially, it involves purchasing a residential property to rent to a third party while, at the same time, renting another property to live in.

It’s the mechanism that many young (and some not so young) adults are using to get a foothold in increasingly less affordable housing markets, particularly in Melbourne and Sydney. Many property spruikers, who previously would have used the old chestnut that “rent money is dead money” to promote residential property purchase, now promote rentvesting as a smart way to rent and buy property.

But does rentvesting make financial sense? We have identified at least three approaches to rentvesting, making it difficult to generalise. The three approaches are:

Click Here To Read More

The purpose of personal financial planning

The purpose of personal financial planning


The “big picture”: Matching your lifetime financial assets and liabilities

Most people don’t really grasp what we regard as the primary purpose of personal financial planning. As a result, they often fail to identify some long term issues that should significantly influence their current decision making.

Personal financial planning is often viewed as having three increasing levels of complexity or sophistication. They are:

  • Financial planning as investment advice – those without experience of financial planning usually associate it primarily with providing advice on investments. Some planners, while paying lip service to the more sophisticated levels of financial planning, also see their key role as advising on and managing investments;
  • Financial planning as technical advice – while also providing investment advice, planners provide advice of a more technical nature in areas such as superannuation, taxation, insurance and estate planning; and
  • Financial planning as strategic advice – more generally known as comprehensive or lifestyle planning, detailed long term cash flow analysis examines the consistency of a client’s lifestyle objectives with their current and projected financial resources. Relevant investment and technical advice is also provided to increase the chances that any gap between the client’s current and desired position is closed with no more investment risk than is necessary.

Click Here To Read More

Australian households have never been wealthier

170517.Household wealth Picture

High level aggregate data suggest household balance sheets are in good shape …

 

In both actual dollar terms and relative to household incomes, Australian households have never been wealthier. The chart below (or a variant of it) is often used to demonstrate that despite the potentially worrying levels of debt being taken on by households, net wealth as a percentage of income has completely recovered from GFC lows and now exceeds the previous pre-GFC, September 2007, high.

Click Here To Read More

At last, a “good news” financial planning story

170418.Good News

Our clients respond to an online “Client experience” survey

In late February-early March 2017, a representative group of our clients was asked to participate in a confidential on-line “Client Experience” survey. The survey aimed to help us, among other things, better understand:

• what our clients look for in their relationship with us;
• how they measure the value of our service;
• their greatest personal finance fears; and
• how they felt we were doing.

We were pleased with the 70% response rate we received and thank those clients who participated.

The same survey was simultaneously offered to clients of other financial advisers that choose to use the services of global fund manager, Dimensional Funds Advisors, both in Australia and internationally. The results provide us with the opportunity to compare our clients’ feedback with that of almost 19,000 other respondents.

Click Here To Read More

The trade-offs for financial independence

170321.Financial independence Levers

There are three levers of financial independence

To increase the chances of achieving financial independence (i.e. having sufficient investment wealth to fund your desired lifestyle indefinitely, without the need to work), you have essentially three options or levers available to you. They are listed below in order of capacity to directly control:

  1. Reduce cash outflows, including lifestyle spending, taxes and investment costs;
  2. Increase cash inflows, primarily from increased employment or business income; and/or
  3. Increase net (i.e. after costs) investment returns.

Most families have significant discretion regarding the amount of their cash outflows and, within a fairly broad range, are able to decide (above a base level of living) how much they want to spend.

Click Here To Read More

How should I rebalance my growth portfolio?

170221.Rebalancing

The key decision is your defensive versus growth allocation

It is a key element of our approach to investment risk management that you should select a target asset allocation that is consistent with your attitude to risk (i.e. a level of investment risk that will enable you to “sleep well”, regardless of what investment markets are doing). The target is to be met at or before your desired retirement date and/or by the time you wish to be financially independent (i.e. have sufficient investment wealth to support your desired lifestyle, without the need to work).

The target asset allocation is primarily focused on your mix of defensive assets (i.e. cash, fixed interest) and growth assets (i.e. primarily, Australian and international shares, and property). If the current defensive/growth allocation varies from target, we work with clients to develop and implement a strategy to transition over time from where they are now to that target.

We also agree with clients how they allocate the growth component of their investment portfolio between the primary growth asset classes i.e. Australian shares, international shares and property. While this allocation decision is both part art and part science, most investors (both in Australia and around the world) tend to have a strong “home company bias” i.e. Australian investors tend to heavily overweight Australian shares and property, despite our markets only being a small percentage of global share and property markets.

Click Here To Read More

The “retirement spending smile”

170117.Retirement smile

Retirement spending shown to decrease with age

We have written a lot about the pattern of retirement spending, with “Will spending remain constant in retirement?”, from 2013, and “How much do I need to retire, revisited?”, of only three months ago, being particularly relevant. The underlying theme of these articles is that we don’t believe our “Rule of 25”, the suggestion that you need investment wealth of at least 25 times your expected annual retirement spending to be highly confident of financing a 30 year retirement, is conservative or an unrealistic “rule of thumb response” to the “How much do I need to retire” question.

However, a recent article in “Forbes” magazine, titled “What is the ‘Retirement Spending Smile’?”, by Professor Wade Pfau, a prominent US academic specialising in the financial planning field, provides another potential challenge to the robustness of the “Rule of 25”. It examines US research on retirement spending, by David Blanchett [1], that suggests spending tends to decrease both at and during retirement at a real rate of about 1% p.a.

Click Here To Read More

Will share returns remain low?

161115-share-returns-low

Share and cash investment returns are unexciting

It feels like the Australian share market has been going up and down in about the same spot for the past six or seven years. Many are becoming disillusioned with shares as an investment class and are looking to “juice returns” with the various hybrid structures and private equity “opportunities” on offer to take advantage of the discontent.

Cash, in the form of term deposits, has also lost its lustre, with yields at record lows. It’s not surprising that in this environment the perennial favourite, direct investment into residential property, has become even more popular. The house price rises experienced over the past three or four years, particularly in Sydney and Melbourne, make the share market appear a pretty dull alternative.

This article examines some of the historical facts that underpin current feelings. While we don’t know what will happen in the future, the past suggests that current investment returns are not inconsistent with what investment theory would expect and may not be a good guide to future investment returns.

Click Here To Read More

How much do I need to retire, revisited?

161011-retirement-need

The “Rule of 25” sets a daunting target, for many

When we talk to prospective clients who are at or close to retirement, one of their inevitable questions is “Have I saved enough to retire?”. We explain that while we need to understand their situation in greater detail, our rule of thumb is that they should aim for at least 25 years of expected annual spending i.e. our “Rule of 25”.

So, if they expect to spend $100,000 p.a. in retirement, a reasonable guide is that they need more than $2.5 million in net investment wealth, assuming they wish to stay in their current home and have no other lifestyle assets or expected inheritances to draw on.

Unfortunately, too often, our prospective client has saved nowhere near this amount, with little prospect of doing so between now and retirement. Typically, they may have saved about 15-16 years of their expected annual spending i.e. $1.5 – $1.6 million in the above example.

It isn’t unusual for them to comment that that they are sure that many of their friends are far less prepared, financially, for retirement than they are and to ask how will such people cope. They also ask or, we suspect, think, are we too conservative?

Click Here To Read More