<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why have a Self Managed Super Fund?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/why-have-a-self-managed-super-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/why-have-a-self-managed-super-fund/</link>
	<description>Personal wealth management issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/why-have-a-self-managed-super-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/?p=236#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Adrian. Your comments are valid, however a binding death nomination will not help to retain super death benefits within the super environment. Its purpose is to ensure that the trustee cannot utilise its discretion in who to pay the death benefits to. 

If you died with $1m of super benefits in the accumulation phase with a binding death noimination to your spouse, and the trust deed stipulates that death benefits will be paid as a lump sum, then your spouse will receive $1m in cash. Which is then difficult to get back into the super environrmt. However, if the trust deed allows for the death benefits to be retained in the fund and offers the spouse the right to choose to take it the benefits as a pension, then the benfits can be retained in the tax friendly environment. 

The SMSF trust structure allows for this flexibility. There are other alternatives out there that offer this, however they do not offer you the benefit of becoming the trustee of your fund. Being trustee provides you with a lot more flexibility for managing your benefits. You do not have to set up arrangements to over ride the trustee - it is you. You therefore do not have to commit to binding nominations or reversionary pension options unless they are relevant to your circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Adrian. Your comments are valid, however a binding death nomination will not help to retain super death benefits within the super environment. Its purpose is to ensure that the trustee cannot utilise its discretion in who to pay the death benefits to. </p>
<p>If you died with $1m of super benefits in the accumulation phase with a binding death noimination to your spouse, and the trust deed stipulates that death benefits will be paid as a lump sum, then your spouse will receive $1m in cash. Which is then difficult to get back into the super environrmt. However, if the trust deed allows for the death benefits to be retained in the fund and offers the spouse the right to choose to take it the benefits as a pension, then the benfits can be retained in the tax friendly environment. </p>
<p>The SMSF trust structure allows for this flexibility. There are other alternatives out there that offer this, however they do not offer you the benefit of becoming the trustee of your fund. Being trustee provides you with a lot more flexibility for managing your benefits. You do not have to set up arrangements to over ride the trustee &#8211; it is you. You therefore do not have to commit to binding nominations or reversionary pension options unless they are relevant to your circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/why-have-a-self-managed-super-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/?p=236#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>Quote: &quot;This can be important in matters such as estate planning. Imagine if you had managed your affairs to take advantage of the pre June 2007 $1 million contribution opportunity, only to die in July 2007. With any structure other than a SMSF, the third party trustee would in most cases transfer your funds out of the super environment.

However, with a SMSF the trustee (usually your surviving spouse) could retain the benefits within the fund, allowing for a pension to be drawn offering potentially huge future tax savings.&quot;

In ALL cases the trustee will retain benefits within the super environment as long as the member has structured the investment in the correct manner. ie. super with a BINDING DEATH NOMINATION or pension fund with REVERSIONARY BENEFICIARY. Of course, not all fund managers offer these options and not every member structures everything correctly. The same is true for a SMSF though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: &#8220;This can be important in matters such as estate planning. Imagine if you had managed your affairs to take advantage of the pre June 2007 $1 million contribution opportunity, only to die in July 2007. With any structure other than a SMSF, the third party trustee would in most cases transfer your funds out of the super environment.</p>
<p>However, with a SMSF the trustee (usually your surviving spouse) could retain the benefits within the fund, allowing for a pension to be drawn offering potentially huge future tax savings.&#8221;</p>
<p>In ALL cases the trustee will retain benefits within the super environment as long as the member has structured the investment in the correct manner. ie. super with a BINDING DEATH NOMINATION or pension fund with REVERSIONARY BENEFICIARY. Of course, not all fund managers offer these options and not every member structures everything correctly. The same is true for a SMSF though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital-Gains &#187; Capital Gains Taxation Under Different Tax Regimes</title>
		<link>http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/why-have-a-self-managed-super-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital-Gains &#187; Capital Gains Taxation Under Different Tax Regimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/?p=236#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Why have a Self Managed Super Fund? : : Wealth Foundations ArticlesA smart investment strategy that defers unrealised capital gains until the pension phase can add up to an estimated 0.5% p.a. to your after tax investment returns. Improved Cash Flow Management. With transition to retirement pension &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why have a Self Managed Super Fund? : : Wealth Foundations ArticlesA smart investment strategy that defers unrealised capital gains until the pension phase can add up to an estimated 0.5% p.a. to your after tax investment returns. Improved Cash Flow Management. With transition to retirement pension &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnjoyLivingWealthy.Com - Discover How To Create A Truly Wealthy LifeStyle</title>
		<link>http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/why-have-a-self-managed-super-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>EnjoyLivingWealthy.Com - Discover How To Create A Truly Wealthy LifeStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wealthfoundations.com.au/blog/?p=236#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] original here: Why have a Self Managed Super Fund? : : Wealth Foundations Articles         Leave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original here: Why have a Self Managed Super Fund? : : Wealth Foundations Articles         Leave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
